I saw this story posted on a variety of a Facebook accounts and a couple of websites. The individuals responding to this story were outraged and blamed everyone for this blatant wrongdoing. The story and all the news articles are reporting what the family is telling them, and only have half the information regarding the situation is being presented. I think this happens quite often within the media where only half the story is being reported and very little follow-up will be conducted following the events. Even though, only half the story is being reported, I think, the story presents several wonderful questions that need to be considered for all parents and members of society.
- Whose responsibility and to what degree do children need to be protected? i.e. Should we of standards of neglect or abuse and who determines standards?
- Should governments role to protect the child be placed above potential misguiding’s?
- Often times, parents do not perceive their role as neglectful or abusive even though their actions could have detrimental effects of the child, and do these variations in actions affect government’s role to protect the child?
These are a few questions that I thought of when looking through the story and questioning the appropriateness of a government agency to take a person's child. This current story appears to have parents who are full of love and caring and only want the best for their child. However, in most cases the parents may not see their neglect or abuse as something wrong rather as a punishment or lack of appropriate social etiquette.
I am not saying that these parents deserve to have their child taken away, and if it is a case, where the child was taken away wrongfully what recourse should the parents have. I saw comments related to the story suggesting they sue or that it was the doctor’s fault because he was on a power trip. I think this story presents a great example of when is the correct time to intervene. Should the child be subject to extensive amounts abuse before they are taken away from the family, or do you protect the child at the risk of causing the parents emotional distress. Ultimately I believe, the responsibility should be to the child versus parents because the parents can at least defend their actions verbally or in an appropriate and effective manner.
More information can be found at
http://www.thehealthyhomeeconomist.com/cps-takes-baby-after-parents-seek-second-medical-opinion/ or News 10